Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

50 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 3584577/CSCD/4
  • Status: Accepted
An objection is made in respect of the proposed policy in so far as this does not allow for any consequential rolling back of the existing Green Belt at Dundry in order to provide for the strategic development needs of the district.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 1059713/CSCD/4
  • Status: Accepted
An objection is made in respect of the proposed policy in so far as this does not allow for any consequential rolling back of the existing Green Belt at Nailsea in order to provide for the strategic development needs of the District in response to these representations, particularly those relating to policies CS13, CS14, CS20 and CS31.
Wrington Parish Council 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 1019201/CSCD/7
  • Status: Accepted
The policy statement is supported, although not the reference to possible further amendments to the Green Belt at BIA, which is opposed. The Council's view is that the Green Belt boundary should be extended to south in this parish to run along the course of the River Yeo, which would compensate for the loss of parish Green Belt land at the airport as a result of the 'inset'.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 3331585/CSCD/1
  • Status: Accepted
Development, no matter where, should be to satisfy the needs of society and subject to all due consideratons as is defined by this document. Utilisation of Green Belt in particular, should, as stated, only be considerd in exceptional circumstances and where the need cannot be satisfied elsewhere. Development should never be led by the financial needs of a landowner or developer.
LandTrust Developments Ltd 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 3620513/CSCD/7
  • Status: Accepted
CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt - it is not the case that the boundaries of the Bristol-Bath Green Belt will remain unchanged and the policy will need to reflect what the rest of the Core Strategy provides for when it contains the most appropriate strategy
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 3583745/CSCD/4
  • Status: Accepted
An objection is made in respect of the proposed policy in so far as this does not allow for any consequential rolling back of the existing Green Belt at Dundry in order to provide for the strategic development needs of the district.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 3399393/CSCD/4
  • Status: Accepted
We object to this policy as the Council has not amended the Green Belts within the District in accordance with the requirements of the PCRSS. This policy therefore fails the test of conformity required by PPS12. PROPOSED CHANGE: Policy CS6 should be amended and the Green Belt boundaries adjusted to reflect the requirements of the PCRSS.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 3370849/CSCD/4
  • Status: Accepted
An objection is made in respect of the proposed policy in so far as this does not allow for any consequential rolling back of the existing Green Belt at Nailsea in order to provide for the strategic development needs of the district in response to these respresentations, particularly those relating to policies CS13, CS14, CS20 and CS31.
Brockley Parish Council 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 1048801/CSCD/4
  • Status: Accepted
Fully supports no boundary changes to the Green Belt now or in the review of the BIA Master Plan, post 2011. Core Strategy should make clear that additional car parking on Green Belt land to the south of the airport would not be considered as exceptional circumstances to justify approval.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Living Within Environmental Limits CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 3586657/CSCD/5
  • Status: Accepted
An objection is made in respect of the proposed policy in so far as this does not allow for any consequential rolling back of the existing Green Belt at Portishead in order to provide for the strategic development needs of the District in response to these representations, particularly those relating to policies CS13, CS14, CS20 and CS31.