Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

74 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 24 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS13: Scale of New Housing CS13: Scale of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3342657/CSCD/6
  • Status: Accepted
The scale of new housing for the District should identify land for meeting the RSS requirement of 26,750 additional units. Irrespective of the Council's political position in respect of the SWBUE there is no reasoned justification with regard to the planning considerations to be applied that support any reduction in the total number of dwellings to be provided in the District under this policy.
Environment Agency 24 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS13: Scale of New Housing CS13: Scale of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 1020673/CSCD/37
  • Status: Accepted
We were informed that further growth from Clevedon to Portishead (Area 1 in SFRA Level 2) was not going to occur as existing permissions and built developments achieved their housing figures. If additional housing is still required in this area NSC SFRA Level 2 will need to be updated to ensure there is sufficient technical evidence to support this growth area. NSC need to clarify its position.
Deleted User 23 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS13: Scale of New Housing CS13: Scale of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3619969/CSCD/7
  • Status: Accepted
The undersupply of housing is not in conformity with the Development Plan. No case has been made by the Council as to why, in respect of housing need and anticipated trajectories, no provision for the SWBUE is made. Furthermore, due to a failure by the Council to publish their Sustainability Appraisal, the social implications for failing to provide the SWBUE cannot be fully appreciated.
Deleted User 22 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS13: Scale of New Housing CS13: Scale of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 931361/CSCD/9
  • Status: Accepted
The removal of 9,000 dwelling urban extension at south west Bristol is not adequately justified. The approach adopted of not providing for this shortfall throughout the rest of the district is unviable. The viability of Clevedon, Nailsea and Portishead and the service villages is completely disregarded, leaving them to stagnate, unable to maintain the level of services needed.
Deleted User 22 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS13: Scale of New Housing CS13: Scale of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3556961/CSCD/10
  • Status: Accepted
The removal of 9,000 dwelling urban extension at south west Bristol is not adequately justified. The approach adopted of not providing for this shortfall throughout the rest of the district is unviable. The viability of Clevedon, Nailsea and Portishead and the service villages is completely disregarded, leaving them to stagnate, unable to maintain the level of services needed.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS13: Scale of New Housing CS13: Scale of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3371105/CSCD/7
  • Status: Accepted
The scale of new housing for the District should identify land for meeting the RSS requirement of 26,750 additional units. There is no justification for the deletion of 9,000 dwellings attributable to the South West Bristol Urban Extension. Irrespective of the Council's political position in respect of the SWBUE there is no reasoned justification with regard to the planning considerations to be applied that support any reduction in the total number of dwellings to be provided in the District.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS13: Scale of New Housing CS13: Scale of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3332929/CSCD/2
  • Status: Accepted
The plan to build 9000 new homes on the edge of Weston, equivalent to a new town the size of Clevedon, does not make sense when the area is at real risk of flooding. In any event, the planned expansion is unsustainable.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS13: Scale of New Housing CS13: Scale of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3573825/CSCD/8
  • Status: Accepted
Irrespective of the Council's political position in respect of the SWBUE there is no reasoned justification with regard to the planning considerations to be applied that support any reduction in the total number of dwellings to be provided in the District under this policy.
LandTrust Developments Ltd 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS13: Scale of New Housing CS13: Scale of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3620513/CSCD/10
  • Status: Accepted
CS13: Scale of New Housing (the title appears incomplete given the purpose of this policy) - this should say that land will be identified to meet the provision of the 26,750 dwellings required from 2006 to 2026, and that land is identified within the Core Strategy for the development of an urban extension to the south west of Bristol
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS13: Scale of New Housing CS13: Scale of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3597441/CSCD/7
  • Status: Accepted
You should identify land for 26,750 dwellings. No justification to delete 9,000 dwellings for SWBUE. Had no opportunity to critically examine data for land availability as at April 2009 . Reserve the right to do so and make subsequent reps. Approach of not providing for shortfalls (arising from not meeting full RSS requirement) elsewhere in district, and disregarding needs/viability of service villages through restrictive policies is flawed .
First pagePrevious page Next pageLast page