Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

74 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Alvis and Bennett Families 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3579585/CSCD/8
  • Status: Accepted
1 Should include urban extension areas; 2 Confusion over housing development proposed for rest of Weston; 3 Should be more development at Clevedon,Nailsea and Portishead 4 Development in Service villages is too restrictive 5 Prioritising previously developed land requires flexibility 6 Support for 40 dwellings per hectare; 7 Support for settlement boundary review;8 Deletion of settlement boundaries is not necessary
Wrington Parish Council 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 1019201/CSCD/15
  • Status: Accepted
This policy is supported on condition that there is no change to the Wrington settlement boundary as defined in the Replacement Local Plan and a review of Wrington's proposed status as a 'service village'.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3361665/CSCD/8
  • Status: Accepted
The policy should include and not exclude the urban extension areas proposed. It is difficult to reconcile the figure of 3,000 dwellings quoted for Weston-super-Mare urban area given the comments in paras 3.208 and 3.210 regarding an overprovision of 3,005 dwellings and the other related points referred to in the comments relating to the previous policy. The proposals relating to Clevedon/Nailsea/Portishead should permit a greater scale of residential development than that proposed.
Bristol Water 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 933697/CSCD/16
  • Status: Accepted
We object to this approach, as brownfield sites outside settlements that are, or will be accessible by a choice of means of transport, and that can be demonstrated to be sustainable in other ways should not be precluded by the Core Strategy: the redevelopment and expansion of existing sites for redevelopment would support the overall aim/visions for North Somerset.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3399393/CSCD/6
  • Status: Accepted
The Core Strategy does not provide for the scale and distribution of housing development outside of Weston-super-Mare as required by the PCRSS. As stated previously there is a need to deliver 5,750 dwellings within the remainder of the District. Yatton is a suitable, sustainable settlement for additional housing and employment growth. Our client's site at "Land north of Arnolds Way, Yatton" is not constrained by flood risk or any other significant issues and is an opportunity for development.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3563841/CSCD/7
  • Status: Accepted
The policy should include and not exclude the urban extension areas proposed so that this policy can be properly and logically related to policy CS13. The proposals relating to Clevedon/Nailsea/Portishead should permit a greater scale of residential development than that proposed. The scale of development proposed to be permitted in respect of the Service Villages and small settlements is very restricted as drafted. The deletion of settlement boundaries is considered unnecessary.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3573825/CSCD/9
  • Status: Accepted
The proposals relating to Clevedon/Nailsea/Portishead should permit a greater scale of residential development than that proposed. In respect of prioritising previously developed land, there is a need for flexibility. The target for net density of 40 dpha is supported as being more appropriate. The settlement boundaries will need to be amended. The deletion of all other settlement boundaries is considered unnecessary and counter-productive.
LandTrust Developments Ltd 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3620513/CSCD/11
  • Status: Accepted
CS14: Distribution of New Housing - this policy also needs to refer to the urban extension to the south west of Bristol, and needs to be consistent in its explanation of the number of dwellings to be accommodated within the urban area of Weston-super-Mare.
Winscombe and Sandford Parish… 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 2596033/CSCD/3
  • Status: Accepted
Extensions and additions must be permitted in smaller settlements provided that they comply with 'permitted development'. If this is not allowed, people will have to find alternative accommodation when their existing property no longer meets their current requirements.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3329953/CSCD/3
  • Status: Accepted
"Permitted Development" must apply to the Smaller Settlements.
First pagePrevious page Next pageLast page