Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

74 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 19 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3370849/CSCD/9
  • Status: Accepted
The policy should include and not exclude the urban extension areas. It is difficult to reconcile the figures. the proposals relating to Clevedon/Nailsea/Portishead should permit a greater scale of residential development than that proposed. Equally, the scale of development proposed to be permitted in respect of the Service Villages and small settlements is very restricted. In respect of previously developed land, the need for flexibility is reiterated. The target for net density is supported.
Natural England 17 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 2862209/CSCD/20
  • Status: Accepted
The statement that new development "must not conflict" with environmental protection, Green Belt and nature conservation is welcome as is the requirement for any necessary mitigating or compensatory measures to address any adverse implications.
Deleted User 16 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3573697/CSCD/8
  • Status: Accepted
The policy should include and not exclude the urban extension areas proposed so that this policy can be properly and logically related to policy CS13.
Deleted User 15 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3569313/CSCD/16
  • Status: Accepted
The HCA welcomes the priority to be given to previously developed land, as well as the flexibility in residential densities where conditions allow. The HCA also recommends that reference is given to new initiatives, such as Home Buy Direct scheme which is being delivered at Locking Parklands.
Deleted User 15 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3570689/CSCD/8
  • Status: Accepted
The policy should include and not exclude the urban extension areas proposed so that this policy can be properly and logically related to policy CS13.
Deleted User 11 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3564609/CSCD/8
  • Status: Accepted
The policy should include and not exclude the urban extension areas proposed so that this policy can be properly and logically related to policy CS13. As stated in comments upon the previous policy, the proposals relating to Clevedon/Nailsea/Portishead should permit a greater scale of residential development than that proposed.
Deleted User 10 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3563169/CSCD/8
  • Status: Accepted
The policy should include and not exclude the urban extension areas proposed so that this policy can be properly and logically related to policy CS13. The proposals relating to Clevedon/Nailsea/Portishead should permit a greater scale of residential development than that proposed.
Deleted User 03 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3371009/CSCD/8
  • Status: Accepted
The policy should include and not exclude the urban extension areas proposed so that this policy can be properly and logically related to policy CS13. As stated in comments upon the previous policy, the proposals relating to Clevedon/Nailsea/Portishead should permit a greater scale of residential development than that proposed. It follows from the objections above that the settlement boundaries will need to be amended accordingly.
Deleted User 02 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 3362433/CSCD/8
  • Status: Accepted
The policy should include and not exclude the urban extension areas proposed so that this policy can be properly and logically related to policy CS13. It is difficult to reconcile the figure of 3,000 dwellings quoted for Weston-super-Mare urban area given the comments in paras 3.208 and 3.210 regarding an overprovision of 3,005 dwellings and the other related points referred to in the comments relating to the previous policy.
barrow gurney parish council 01 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS14: Distribution of New Housing CS14: Distribution of New Housing

  • Comment ID: 1047777/CSCD/9
  • Status: Accepted
Within South Bristol the priority is regeneration of "brown field" urban areas; their concern is that development of green field Green Belt land could prejudice these objectives. We support the Core Strategy approach to local affordable housing with sensible conditions. We note the Green Belt is a key policy constraint within the north of the district, related to higher order settlements in Bristol. Supported. We note CS18 Gypsies-Travellers includes sensible caveats.
Next pageLast page