Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

58 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Natural England 17 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making

  • Comment ID: 2862209/CSCD/19
  • Status: Accepted
We broadly agree with the scope of this emerging policy. High quality urban design has a key role in shaping sustainable places, encouraging healthy living and community wellbeing. The references to sustainable land use and sensitivity to local character are particularly welcome.
Deleted User 16 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making

  • Comment ID: 3573697/CSCD/6
  • Status: Accepted
The general requirements for residential development to achieve the Building for Life Gold standard is considered to be unreasonable unless it is subject to consideration of the broader viability of such development.
Deleted User 15 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making

  • Comment ID: 3569313/CSCD/14
  • Status: Accepted
The HCA therefore supports the objective of this policy and agrees that where possible, development should seek to deliver a high quality of design.
Deleted User 15 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making

  • Comment ID: 3570689/CSCD/6
  • Status: Accepted
The general requirements for residential development to achieve the Building for Life Gold standard is considered to be unreasonable unless it is subject to consideration of the broader viability of such development.
Deleted User 11 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making

  • Comment ID: 3564609/CSCD/6
  • Status: Accepted
The general requirements for residential development to achieve the Building for Life Gold standard is considered to be unreasonable unless it is subject to consideration of the broader viability of such development.
Deleted User 10 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making

  • Comment ID: 3563169/CSCD/6
  • Status: Accepted
All the requirements of this policy should be subject to viability considerations and the wording amended accordingly. In respect of the sub-heading of "Masterplanning" the first sentence is an isolated statement without reasoned justification and should be deleted. The general requirements for residential development to achieve the Building for Life Gold standard is considered to be unreasonable unless it is subject to consideration of the broader viability of such development.
Deleted User 05 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making

  • Comment ID: 931361/CSCD/8
  • Status: Accepted
The general requirements for residential development to achieve the Building for Life Gold standard is considered to be unreasonable unless it is subject to consideration of the broader viability of such development.
Deleted User 03 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making

  • Comment ID: 3371009/CSCD/6
  • Status: Accepted
In the third sentence of the first paragraph of this policy its meaning is unclear, by virtue of its grammatical construction, and should be deleted. In respect of the sub-heading of "Masterplanning" the first sentence is an isolated statement without reasoned justification and should be deleted. The general requirements for residential development to achieve the Building for Life Gold standard is considered unreasonable unless subject to consideration of the broader viability of development.
Deleted User 02 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making

  • Comment ID: 3362433/CSCD/6
  • Status: Accepted
In the third sentence of the first paragraph of this policy its meaning is unclear, by virtue of its grammatical construction, and it should therefore be deleted. In respect of the sub-heading of "Masterplanning" the first sentence is an isolated statement without reasoned justification and should be deleted.
Deleted User 25 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 3: Spatial Policies Delivering Strong and Inclusive Communities CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making CS12: Achieving High Quality Design and Place-making

  • Comment ID: 3331489/CSCD/8
  • Status: Accepted
Additional office development and employment growth is an important part of building sustainable communities as advocated within PPS1 and is necessary to ensure the economic and social wellbeing of a community.
Next pageLast page