Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

40 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 16 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 3573697/CSCD/18
  • Status: Accepted
In relation to both the employment and residential development elements of this policy, this should permit an increased level of development than the limited extent currently envisaged under the proposed policy. Yatton should be considered to be a market town the subject of this policy.
Deleted User 15 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 3570689/CSCD/18
  • Status: Accepted
In light of the representations made under policies CS13, CS14 and CS20, consequential amendments will be required to this policy to give effect to same. Yatton should be considered to be a market town the subject of this policy.
Deleted User 15 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 3569313/CSCD/30
  • Status: Accepted
The policy appears to indicate that mixed use schemes will not be permitted where a local housing need is not demonstrated. The HCA however, has concerns that this may hinder the delivery of affordable housing if general housing schemes are precluded from coming forward.
Deleted User 11 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 3564609/CSCD/18
  • Status: Accepted
Yatton should be considered to be a market town the subject of this policy. Land on the north west side of Yatton is available and would be suitable for development should it be required to meet some element of the strategic development needs of the district.
Deleted User 03 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 3371009/CSCD/22
  • Status: Accepted
In light of the representations made under policies CS13, CS14 and CS20, consequential amendments will be required to this policy to give effect to same. In relation to both the employment and residential development elements of this policy, this should permit an increased level of development than the limited extent currently envisaged under the proposed policy.
Deleted User 03 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 3362433/CSCD/23
  • Status: Accepted
In light of the representations made under policies CS13, CS14 and CS20, consequential amendments will be required to this policy to give effect to same. In relation to both the employment and residential development elements of this policy, this should permit an increased level of development than the limited extent currently envisaged under the proposed policy.
Nailsea Town Council 02 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 706241/CSCD/5
  • Status: Accepted
The concerns regarding internal inconsistencies in the Core Strategy can be encompassed in relation to the goals of CS31 i.e. increase self-containment, availability of jobs and services and improve the town's role as a service centre.
Deleted User 25 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 3331489/CSCD/2
  • Status: Accepted
Currently the Green Belt boundary is tightly drawn around Portishead but in aspiring to achieve the employment growth needs of Portishead, complicated by the competing demands for land for housing development, minor changes to the Green Belt boundary on the edge of Portishead be required to accommodate further development at Portis Fields.
Deleted User 25 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 3331489/CSCD/7
  • Status: Accepted
Gladman welcome the identification of Portishead for continued encouragement from the council towards the take-up of existing business premises, site allocations and the expansion of existing businesses.
Environment Agency 24 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS31: Market and Coastal Towns CS31: Market and Coastal Towns

  • Comment ID: 1020673/CSCD/49
  • Status: Accepted
The Agency was informed that further growth from Clevedon to Portishead (Area 1 in SFRA Level 2) was not going to occur, as existing permissions and built developments achieved the required housing figures.
Next pageLast page