Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

44 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 16 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside

  • Comment ID: 3573697/CSCD/20
  • Status: Accepted
The strictly limited scope for residential development is not appropriate for those settlements currently with a settlement boundary. Reference to employment development should now be reviewed and replaced by wording in accordance with PPS4, particularly policies EC6 and EC10 therein. The requirement that employment development will not be permitted in the open countryside should be deleted.
Deleted User 15 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside

  • Comment ID: 3569313/CSCD/32
  • Status: Accepted
The HCA wishes to ensure that the rural housing needs are met within the District and therefore welcomes the recognition for permitting affordable housing in these locations.
Deleted User 15 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside

  • Comment ID: 3570689/CSCD/20
  • Status: Accepted
The strictly limited scope for residential development is not appropriate for those settlements currently with a settlement boundary. Reference to employment development should now be reviewed and replaced by wording in accordance with PPS4, particularly policies EC6 and EC10 therein.
Deleted User 11 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside

  • Comment ID: 3564609/CSCD/20
  • Status: Accepted
The strictly limited scope for residential development is not appropriate for those settlements currently with a settlement boundary (see other representations under policy CS14 requiring these to be retained). Reference to employment development should now be reviewed and replaced by wording in accordance with PPS4, particularly policies EC6 and EC10 therein.
Deleted User 10 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside

  • Comment ID: 3563169/CSCD/18
  • Status: Accepted
The strictly limited scope for residential development is not appropriate for those settlements currently with a settlement boundary. Reference to employment development should now be reviewed and replaced by wording in accordance with PPS4, particularly policies EC6 and EC10 therein.
Deleted User 03 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside

  • Comment ID: 3362433/CSCD/25
  • Status: Accepted
The strictly limited scope for residential development is not appropriate for those settlements currently with a settlement boundary. The requirement that employment development will not be permitted in the open countryside should be deleted.
Deleted User 03 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside

  • Comment ID: 3371009/CSCD/24
  • Status: Accepted
The strictly limited scope for residential development is not appropriate for those settlements currently with a settlement boundary. Reference to employment development should now be reviewed and replaced by wording in accordance with PPS4, particularly policies EC6 and EC10 therein. The requirement that employment development will not be permitted in the open countryside should be deleted.
Church Commissioners for England 01 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside

  • Comment ID: 1054657/CSCD/1
  • Status: Accepted
Policy CS33 does not provide support for the economic or residential re-use of existing buildings in the open countryside, or within or adjacent to non-service villages. It is therefore inconsistant with Policy EC6 of PPS4. There is also no guidance as to when a replacement building would be permissable in accordance with Policy EC6(d) of PPS4. The policy also fails to acknowledge in accordance with EC12 of PPS4 the circumstances where residential conversion would be preferable to economic uses.
Deleted User 24 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside

  • Comment ID: 3342657/CSCD/20
  • Status: Accepted
The strictly limited scope for residential development is not appropriate for those settlements currently with a settlement boundary. Reference to employment development should now be reviewed and replaced by wording in accordance with PPS4, particularly policies EC6 and EC10 therein.
Environment Agency 24 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 4: Area Policies CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside CS33: Smaller Settlements and Countryside

  • Comment ID: 1020673/CSCD/52
  • Status: Accepted
There is no recognition of flood risk. NSC should use the SFRA to influence any infill, redevelopment or subdivision development. If additional housing is required in this area due to revised growth figures NSC SFRA Level 2 will need to be updated to ensure there is sufficient technical evidence to support this growth area. NSC needs to clarify the position.
Next pageLast page