Core Strategy - Consultation Draft

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

28 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
LandTrust Developments Ltd 19 Jun 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 5: SW Bristol Urban Extension Chapter 5: Introduction

  • Comment ID: 3620513/CSCD/17
  • Status: Accepted
Weston is secondary to Bristol as focus for development and should not have priority. Delivery of housing likely to be lower than that forecast in the plan, over provision at Weston is contrary to the RSS. The greatest contribution to achievement of more sustainable development patterns in the future as well as only realistic way to provide this scale of required development through this plan is by an addition to Bristol. No better alternative solution to providing the need is suggested.
Leigh Woods Society 17 Apr 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 5: SW Bristol Urban Extension Chapter 5: Introduction

  • Comment ID: 930721/CSCD/1
  • Status: Accepted
Object to the change to the Green Belt proposed by the RSS and the consequent developments proposed. Particularly the lost of historic character & identity of Long Ashton, loss of play and pay golf course, and miles of public paths, urban sprawl and loss rural landscape.Plus lack of improvements to the transport infrastructure.
GOSW 17 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 5: SW Bristol Urban Extension Chapter 5: Introduction

  • Comment ID: 1017121/CSCD/6
  • Status: Accepted
A number of steps will be needed to ensure document will be sound when submitted. Should plan positively for 9,000 dwellings at SW Bristol. Understand concerns about delivery rates, but better to plan for whole figure and address any shortfall by monitoring.Only linked new settlement option would maximise sustainability benefits. Accept that nowhere else that such a quantity of housing could be accommodated sustainably.
Deleted User 15 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 5: SW Bristol Urban Extension Chapter 5: Introduction

  • Comment ID: 3569313/CSCD/33
  • Status: Accepted
The HCA's two objectives are to ensure the urban extension delivers affordable housing in a balanced and integrated manner, in parallel to delivering community and physical infrastructure in a phased manner. The second objective for the HCA of the urban extension is to realise the potential of South Bristol as a destination and tackle in a comprehensive manner the identified regeneration and deprivation issues associated with the area.
Deleted User 01 Mar 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 5: SW Bristol Urban Extension Chapter 5: Introduction

  • Comment ID: 1688673/CSCD/2
  • Status: Accepted
During initial talks, the LA has consistently stated that schools should be at the heart of communities they serve. The proposed locations of the primary schools do not set them within the heart of their respective communities. The secondary school is situated too near to the eastern boundary of the development and, if topography permits, it should be located nearer to the Western boundary of the development.
Deleted User 23 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 5: SW Bristol Urban Extension Chapter 5: Introduction

  • Comment ID: 3619969/CSCD/10
  • Status: Accepted
To reference the SWBUE as an addendum is not acceptable, it needs to be ingrained within the CS, through inclusion within appropriate visions, objectives and core policies. CS must be in conformity with the RSS. Any SWBUE policy for the purposes of the CS would only need to identify a strategic allocation subsequently refined in a LDD.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 5: SW Bristol Urban Extension Chapter 5: Introduction

  • Comment ID: 1045217/CSCD/10
  • Status: Accepted
Chapter 5: South West Bristol Urban Extension As stated above, the Trust supports the Council's stance on the urban extension and has responded to the Ashton Park development separately.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 5: SW Bristol Urban Extension Chapter 5: Introduction

  • Comment ID: 3329953/CSCD/7
  • Status: Accepted
South West Bristol extension should not be built in the existing Green Belt.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 5: SW Bristol Urban Extension Chapter 5: Introduction

  • Comment ID: 3330977/CSCD/7
  • Status: Accepted
The principle that any new development should 'minimise the impact on climate change through the promotion of sustainable resources and efficient buildings including energy and waste provision" is far too weakly worded.
Deleted User 19 Feb 2010

Core Strategy - Consultation Draft Chapter 5: SW Bristol Urban Extension Chapter 5: Introduction

  • Comment ID: 2892385/CSCD/14
  • Status: Accepted
We wish to ensure the effectiveness of such a major development. Master plan will need to examine the special characteristics of this part of the district. Character will be determined by analysis of settlement pattern, form, relationship to landscape, built and natral heritage etc. Changes to area should be informed by understanding of environmental capacity. Core Strategy should determine what evidence has been gathered to determine character.
Next pageLast page