Site Allocations Plan March 2016

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

5 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Environment Agency 28 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Schedule 1: Proposed large sites for residential development over 10 dwellings (Sites marked with a * are mixed use sites). Weston-super-Mare Bridge Farm, Bristol Road*

  • Comment ID: 1020673//9
Fluvial and Tidal Flood Zone 3, although models suggest low flood depths with minor flood impact elsewhere.
North Somerset Levels IDB 28 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Schedule 1: Proposed large sites for residential development over 10 dwellings (Sites marked with a * are mixed use sites). Weston-super-Mare Bridge Farm, Bristol Road*

  • Comment ID: 11734177//28
NSLIDB see detailed comments
Deleted User 27 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Schedule 1: Proposed large sites for residential development over 10 dwellings (Sites marked with a * are mixed use sites). Weston-super-Mare Bridge Farm, Bristol Road*

  • Comment ID: 4601345//1
Support for the mixed use development at Bridge Farm, Worle
North Somerset Flood Risk Mana… 26 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Schedule 1: Proposed large sites for residential development over 10 dwellings (Sites marked with a * are mixed use sites). Weston-super-Mare Bridge Farm, Bristol Road*

  • Comment ID: 14550881//85
Employment element - Having looked at the site from an ordinary watercourse, surface water and ground water flooding point of view we have the following comments: Drainage Category 2 - The site could be drained by sustainable drainage, however there are constraints and these need to be considered in the design Reason - Poorly draining - Opportunities for bespoke infiltration SuDS
North Somerset Flood Risk Mana… 26 Apr 2016

Site Allocations Plan March 2016 Schedule 1: Proposed large sites for residential development over 10 dwellings (Sites marked with a * are mixed use sites). Weston-super-Mare Bridge Farm, Bristol Road*

  • Comment ID: 14550881//35
Looking at the site from an ordinary watercourse, surface water and ground water flooding point of view we have the following comments: Category 2 - The site could be drained by sustainable drainage, however there are constraints and these need to be considered in the design Reason - Ground water issues and a pond on site - infiltration/soakaway test required and consider whether infiltration can be used as a SuDS technique alongside water storage (in ponds/chambers) and re-use