Community Infrastructure Levy - Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

2 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 21 Nov 2012

Community Infrastructure Levy - Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule Next Steps Q18 Do you have any further comments on the proposals set out in this document?

  • Comment ID: 3106401/cil/1
  • Status: Accepted
In principle I agree with these proposals although I have 1 major concern! I am worried that the money received will go into one central pot and would not necessarily be used for infrastructure surrounding the development and only those identified by the local plan. There needs to be a ring-fenced amount for each development which is used on the local infrastructure (that which will be affected by the development). This should be particularly for developments that were not in the Local plan and
Deleted User 10 Nov 2012

Community Infrastructure Levy - Preliminary Draft Charging Schedule Next Steps Q18 Do you have any further comments on the proposals set out in this document?

  • Comment ID: 6013569/cil/5
  • Status: Accepted
Funds not ring fenced: While I think it is sensible to allow flexibility on how the funds are spent I also think this needs to be completely transparent to foster public trust in the system. A report saying exactly where monies have come from and where they are going should suffice. For example, using funds from areas around junction 19/20 to improve junction 21 and do nothing towards transport around 19/20 would be illogical because it doesn't actually improve the infrastructure around the area