North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

21 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 14352161//2
I welcome NSC's restatement of this policy. I would object to any change to the Green belt, especially on the south side of Bristol. It is essential that we maintain a strategic gap between N Somerset and Bristol. The minute any building occurs around Bristol, you will see Bristol council and the Mayor argue that the city boundaries should be extended to include the new developments. We would then end up with the sort of massive developments that are occurring on the north side of the city. 
North Somerset Levels IDB 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 11734177//2
This policy remains unchanged and we have no further comment regarding this Policy  
Deleted User 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 4207073//2
The local authority proposes no changes to the Green Belt policy, however in the absence of a proper assessment of the success or otherwise of existing spatial objectives, eg the jobs-led-housing strategy at WsM, or the alternative spatial options to deliver the higher housing figures, together with an updated SEA, it is not possible to determine whether this policy is sound. Therefore this is an objection to proposed policy CS 6. Until such time as a full assessment has been undertaken as set
Deleted User 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 1189921//1
As parishes which are within the Green Belt, we are particularly concerned that the Green Belt should be protected.  We therefore welcome your proposed response that since no special circumstances have been identified, then no change in Policy CS6, Green Belt, should be considered. Should it become necessary to review the Green Belt in the future, we would wish to be involved in any review as early as possible.   (Prepared jointly between Pill and Easton-in-Gordano, Abbots Leigh, Portbury and
Dean Scott 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 1026369//1
We also welcome NSC's restatement of this policy. we would object to any change to the Green Belt, especially on the south side of Bristol. It is essential that we maintain a strategic gap between North Somerset and Bristol. The minute any building occurs around Bristol, you will see Bristol Council and the Mayor argue that the city boundaries should be extended to include the new developments; wWe would then end up with the sort of massive developments that are occurring on the north side of th
Deleted User 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 14402401//2
Although agreeing with this, residents of North Somerset Council should be able to access a definitive illustration/map of The Green Belt on the website or elsewhere to be certain developers are not planning beyond the boundary.
Deleted User 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 5118977//1
I welcome the restatement of this policy, which recognises the value of the Green Belt, and acknowledges the availability of brownfield sites for development.
Deleted User 17 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 14341633//1
I am very pleased to see the council policy regarding greenbelt remaining unchanged, I strongly believe we must protect the greenbelt and re-use brown belt wherever possible.
Deleted User 17 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 4602593//2
Green Belt policy should only be changed in exceptional circumstances.  Nailsea Town Councils belligerent approach to Green Belt around the settlement does not add to the quality of the debate over the future development of this sustainable settlement.  There is land available to the south of Nailsea which is not constrained by such the Green Belt designation.  This land is in close proximity to the station and offers the potential for a mixture of uses to be established without the need for cha
Dundry Parish Council 17 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS6: North Somerset's Green Belt

  • Comment ID: 3324353//1
Dundry Parish Council is pleased to see that this policy is unchanged.
Next pageLast page