North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

16 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Dean Scott 19 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS19: Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 1026369//5
It is vital the council do protect strategic gaps to help retain the separate identity, character and/or landscape setting of settlements and distinct parts of settlements. We are nothing like our neighbouring council authorities and we dont want to be, North Somerset Council makes its decisions in the interest of its residents, authorioties such as Bristol City Coucil most certainly do not
Deleted User 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS19: Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 14352161//4
I support the wording of CS19 Strategic Gaps.
North Somerset Levels IDB 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS19: Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 11734177//4
We note that there is no change to this policy and have no further comment.  
Deleted User 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS19: Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 14402401//4
The character of the landscape should be preserved between the towns and villages of North Somerset and beyond.
Deleted User 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS19: Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 5118977//2
I support the retention of Policy CS19 on strategic gaps, as being important to maintain the distinct character of communities now that additional new housing will be accommodated in both service and infill villages
Simon Hegarty 17 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS19: Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 14339585//1
I  strongly support CS32 and the protection it provides to Service Villages from speculative development both within and without the settlement boundaries.  Any development should be in accordance with local housing needs  (the needs of the village and its environs rather than national or regional housing needs) in respect of affordability and housing mix, be plan led and supported by the community.   I strongly support CS19 re strategic gaps.  These are vital to preserve distinctive settlement
Dundry Parish Council 17 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS19: Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 3324353//3
Dundry Parish Council is pleased to see that the policy on Strategic Gaps remains the same.
Paul Watkins 17 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS19: Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 14339745//3
I strongly support the retention of strategic gaps, and trust that NSC will honour and adhere to them in considering future development applications
Deleted User 17 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS19: Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 4602593//4
The designation should not be accompanied by inflexible policies that restrict all development within a gap. Gleeson advocates that proposals that incorporate development within the Strategic Gap are considered on a site by site basis as development associated within a Strategic Gap location may be the most sustainable location for such development. Our comments are focused in particular on the strategic gap to the south of Nailsea.  Is there a need for a gap between the modest settlement of Ba
Deleted User 17 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS19: Strategic Gaps

  • Comment ID: 14340929//6
Kingston Seymour PC strongly supports the retention of this policy. 
Next pageLast page