North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

46 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
S and D Williams 04 Jan 2016

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 10315841//1
We understand that the Core Strategy on housing numbers for North Somerset is yet to be adopted with a shortfall of some 1715 houses to be identified. We hope that the small village of Backwell is not one expected to accommodate further housing over and above the sites already identified, where the schools, road and medical are already at capacity. This was supported by Backwell's Neighbourhood Plan which clearly stated that public opinion was against any major housing development. Backwell al
Churchill Parish Council 21 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 1190177//1
Churchill PC wholly supports CS32 and the protection it provides to Service Villages from speculative development both within and without settlement boundaries.  It is essential for any developments to be meet identified local housing needs in respect of affordability and and dwelling mix, be plan led and supported by the community. 
Dean Scott 19 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 1026369//3
We believe CS32 policy of small scale development within the identified service villages to be the correct approach and the best way for housing distribution. The pressure from developers to make large new urban areas for easy profit must be resisted.
Deleted User 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 14343489//1
I wholly support CS32 and the protection it provides to Service Villages from speculative development both within and without settlement boundaries. It is essential for any developments to meet identified local housing needs in respect of affordability and dwelling mix, be plan led and supported by the community.
Keith Riches 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 10280545//1
We write to comment on the Core Strategy and in particular those sections relating to housing development. Firstly, we applaud the Council's efforts over several years to propose a sensible limit on new dwellings in North Somerset, linked to likely provision of employment. By contrast, the eventual figure arrived at by the Inspector, seemingly over-influenced by developers and ratified by central government, is far too high. Achieving this figure would/will have a seriously detrimental effect o
Deleted User 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 14402401//7
I am pleased this remains unchanged and future development will respect the character of the West Country.  
Deleted User 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 14344097//1
I support policy CS32.  Additional new housing must respect the character of service villages, and  not generate a demand for local services on a scale that cannot be met.
Deleted User 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 14344001//1
I wholly support policy CS32 and feel that any development should be led by the community for which it is planned.  Development should not be allowed by 'get rich quick' corporations and any development should reflect the needs of the community taking into account the infrastructure and facilities of the area.  Whilst we accept there is a need for local housing, this should be kept to the minimum and controlled carefully to ensure that our children are not priced out of the villages by greedy sp
Environment Agency 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 1020673//4
All new development should be in-accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), specifically relevant for the Agency would be any development within flood plain. This should include evidence of Sequential Test acceptability, as well as an appropriate Flood Risk Assessment which addresses all flood concerns.
Deleted User 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS32: Service Villages

  • Comment ID: 14347425//1
With regard to CS32 I support the general tenet of CS32 but do not believe there are any circumstances under which development would be considered outside the settlement boundary. It is essential for any developments to meet identified local housing needs in respect of affordability and and dwelling mix, be plan led and supported by the relevant community. 
Next pageLast page