North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33

List Comments

Search for Comments

Response Type
Order By
in order

20 comments.

List of comments
RespondentResponse DateDetails
Deleted User 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS33: Smaller settlements and countryside

  • Comment ID: 4207073//8
 The Council proposes no changes to the policy wording or to the text to CS32 and CS33. This presumably means that local authority see no particular issues with increasing the housing levels by 200 % in each circumstance. This absence of spatial planning, belies the planning crisis that currently inflicts these areas of the district. Due to the failure of the local authority to determine a sound housing figure in their Core Strategy, together with the backlog of housing delivery and the paucity
Deleted User 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS33: Smaller settlements and countryside

  • Comment ID: 5118977//4
I support CS33.  The policy clearly identifies our existing infill villages, and protects their character and sustainability by permitting only community-led small scale residential development.  As such, the policy should protect against disproportionately large and unsustainable developments in infill villages, in line with the NPPF.
Deleted User 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS33: Smaller settlements and countryside

  • Comment ID: 14402401//8
I am pleased that this remains unchanged and await with concern the result of planned applications in my "infill village" and hope that NSC will honour its commitment to this Strategy.  
Environment Agency 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS33: Smaller settlements and countryside

  • Comment ID: 1020673//5
All new development should be in-accordance with the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF), specifically relevant for the Agency would be any development within flood plain. This should include evidence of Sequential Test acceptability, as well as an appropriate Flood Risk Assessment which addresses all flood concerns.
North Somerset Levels IDB 18 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS33: Smaller settlements and countryside

  • Comment ID: 11734177//9
We note that there is no change to this policy however we would wish for the policy to be amended to require that Flood risk and drainage must be considered at a local and catchment scale by the planning authority, and any proposed development will need to be supported by a flood risk assessment which reflects this approach within its proposed surface water drainage strategy.
Deleted User 17 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS33: Smaller settlements and countryside

  • Comment ID: 14341953//6
I fully support this.  As a resident of Sandford, I feel that very small developments within the village boundary are acceptable, as long as they are in keeping with the village and size appropriate.  Green belt should be protected from development.  Affordable housing should be included.  We must consider the lack of services and jobs within these villages, which amongst other things, will impact traffic in the area (which is already a huge problem).
mendipmagpie 17 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS33: Smaller settlements and countryside

  • Comment ID: 12281217//4
I fuly support CS33 and sincerely hope NSC continue to protect the infill villages
Deleted User 17 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS33: Smaller settlements and countryside

  • Comment ID: 14341633//3
I am glad to see the council is continuing to restrict the development in the infill villages to within the settlement boundaries
Dundry Parish Council 17 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS33: Smaller settlements and countryside

  • Comment ID: 3324353//4
Dundry Parish Council is pleased to see that the policy on Infill villages remains the same
Deleted User 17 Dec 2015

North Somerset Core Strategy Consultation on consequential changes to remitted policies CS6, CS14, CS19, CS28, CS30, CS31, CS32, CS33 Policy CS33: Smaller settlements and countryside

  • Comment ID: 14340929//8
Kingston Seymour PC strongly supports the retention of this policy, which is based on sound sustainability principles. Whilst it recognises the need for facilitating the construction of small numbers of affordable houses to meet identified local needs, it believes that larger-scale development would be fundamentally unsustainable and unjustifiable. 
Next pageLast page